co2A very important and far reaching development has been announced last week by the National Treasury when it announced that new light commercial vehicles – like passenger vehicles – will be subject to a new green tax! We would like to pause for a moment and reflect on the media release from the National Treasury.

History of this CO2 Vehicle Emissions Tax and the Inclusion of Double Cabs and Small Bakkies

The South African government has made clear its intention to introduce environmental taxes and incentives to ensure that our economic growth is directed towards a more sustainable path. In the 2009 Budget, the Minister of Finance announced a reform of the ad valorem excise duty on motor vehicles (both motor cars and light commercial vehicles) to include a CO2 emissions component. This was in line with an earlier proposal by the then Department of Minerals and Energy (in 2004) to encourage the use of more fuel efficient vehicles through the taxation of tax ‘gas guzzlers’, meaning vehicles with a high engine capacity such as double cabs/4x4s which are not fuel efficient.

Research also indicated close correlations between vehicle engine size, fuel efficiency, and CO2 emissions. It is in this context that the 2009 Budget proposal to tax vehicle CO2 emissions was framed.

After consultation with the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa (NAAMSA), it was agreed that the implementation of the proposed vehicle CO2 emissions tax would be delayed and reformed into a specific tax.

Amendment taking effect 1 September 2010

This amendment was announced in 2010 Budget, to take effect on 1 September 2010. The industry also requested that the tax be limited to passenger vehicles because there was no data on CO2 emissions by light commercial vehicles, which is why the 2010 Budget Review only refers to passenger vehicles.

It was always the intention that the definition of passenger vehicles would include double cabs and by inference small bakkies because these are often used as passenger vehicles. The one legal hurdle was that the harmonized code of classification in terms of the Customs and Excise Act, under whose umbrella the CO2 emissions tax is being implemented, defines double cabs (4X4) and some smaller bakkies as light commercial vehicles.

Definition of passenger vehicle for tax purposes

The VAT Act partially addresses this problem by defining a passenger vehicle as including:

“a motor car, station wagon, minibus, double cab light delivery vehicle and any other motor vehicle of a kind normally used on public roads, which has three or more wheels and is constructed or converted wholly or mainly for the carriage of passengers, …”.

Since it was not possible to use VAT definition of a passenger car for the purpose of implementing CO2 emissions tax under the umbrella of the Customs and Excise Act, National Treasury decided to include in the definition of a passenger car all categories of light commercial vehicles, as defined in the harmonised code of classification, but excluding light trucks.

Objections from the motoring industry

The motor industry has objected to the inclusion of double cabs and small bakkies as passenger vehicles in the proposed vehicle CO2 emissions tax net. The industry argues that these vehicles are classified as light commercial vehicles which should be excluded from the CO2 vehicle emissions tax.

In addition, the industry says that emissions data for light commercial vehicles are not available.

National Treasury & Response pertaining to double cab vehicles

National Treasury has always intended to include double cab vehicles in the first phase of the implementation of the CO2 vehicle emissions tax. This is in line with the intent of the VAT Act and the fact that double cabs are mainly used as passenger vehicles.

Including double cabs in the CO2 vehicle emissions tax net is also in line with the original intent of this proposed tax: the taxation high engine capacity vehicles to discourage the use of vehicles are not fuel efficient and encourage the shift to the more fuel efficient ones.

In addition, the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications, a subsidiary of the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), has also confirmed that data on CO2 emissions expressed as g/km is available for all vehicles. It is also possible to calculate a vehicle’s CO2 emissions based on its engine size.

Since most small single cab bakkies and their double cab equivalents have similar engine sizes, these two categories of vehicles should be treated the same for the purpose of the vehicle CO2 emissions tax. Against this background, the request by the industry to exclude double cabs and small bakkies from the vehicle CO2 emissions tax can therefore not be accepted.

Tax Administration

The CO2 vehicle emissions tax will be collected and paid over to the South African Revenue Services by the vehicle manufactures and /or importers. A part (or all) of the CO2 vehicle emissions tax is thus likely to be built into the price the manufacturer or importer charges their clients. It will be good practice if dealers could reflect on the invoices to their clients the CO2 emissions of each vehicle and the estimated total CO2 emissions tax.

Issued by: National Treasury
Date: 3 August 2010

What will the effect be of this new emissions tax?

• The tax will be levied at R75 per g/km on vehicles emitting more than 120 g/km CO2.
• According to McCarthy CEO Brand Pretorius South Africa is unique in an international context because it is the only country that is imposing a carbon tax on light commercial vehicles from September 1.
• The proposed tax would add about R10 000 to R20 000 to the price of a light commercial vehicle, depending on the model.

In an earlier blog post we discussed the topic “Increase in SUV and 4×4 sales – but are they correctly insured?”. We emphasized that more and more vehicle owners opt for these vehicles and their reasons include:

*They are more spacious/ comfortable;
* Being higher, they offer better visibility;
* They can go anywhere, which suits outdoor SA lifestyles;
* They are seen as safer for their occupants in a crash;
* They can ride the potholes better [road conditions off the main roads have deteriorated];
* The best equal or exceed the luxury of the best saloon cars;
* They convey an adventurous “tough guy” image.

The CO2 emissions tax might now add a significant amount to the purchase price of these vehicles – making it more expensive not only to buy but also to ensure. We can expect further consultation between the motoring manufacturing industry and the Treasury, but – whatever the outcome – vehicle owners would have to be sensitive to not only what vehicle they purchase but also how they go about ensuring this vehicle.

Be Sociable, Share!

6 thoughts on “CO2 Vehicle Emissions Tax, Double Cabs and Car Insurance

  1. Dave Vermeulen

    Will this tax effect used vehicles?

  2. Tina

    I am buying a d/cab because of the poor condition of the South African roads.I damaged my BMW through a pothole and it cost me a lot of money to have it repaired.Why must i pay co2 tax in such an environment with poor auality diesel and apauling road conditions????

  3. simon

    Why are we chasing after the new cars again just because they have some money
    what about the millions of scrap cars running around in unroadworthy condition spewing out who knows how much co2 , overloaded , and paying nothing to the economy to maintain the roads etc, yet these people continue all day with nothing being done because everybody says they are hard done by. First cut out the real problems before claiming that taxes on new low emmision vehicles will actually do anything other than make our politicians wealthier.
    just a thought

  4. simon

    Heres an idea why not repair our railroads and make them really work efficiently and get the mass commuters of the roads by giving them true cheap transport, as has been done all over the world , yet here in SA we always try to come up with a clever new way of taxing instead of fixing, toll roads etc 
    what about no taxes for motorcycles as an incentive , oh yes the politicians would loose too much then ?

  5. Gerald

    As a consumer and Tax payer, I would like to know how the C02 revenues will be managed and how will Joe public know for what the collected revenues will
    be used for . It seems the gravy train is about to leave again with our politicians cashing in all the way. I would like to see a government member drive a toyota Tazz as opposed to the Luxury BMW X5 they are used to as they push you out of the way on the highways.

  6. Joey Moodley

    I believe that this is another way that the goverment is using their power to exploit South Africans. We pay PAYE, toll tax, tax on fuel, VAT and now we pay an emission’s tax. It seems we work just to pay taxes which would be stolen by our greedy, corrupt politicians.
    An absolute joke that a 3rd world country with little imopact on the environment must start following 1st world country rules. In addition, if the money was going towards planting new trees etc then it can be justified that there would be a positive impact on our enviroment. Instead the only posistive from this, is the interest earned for our corrupt goverment on the proposed 1 billion collected. Where is this money really going? Maybe to fund more wives!!!!!!!!!!
    The ANC must declare their emissions taxes they are paying with their ESKOM partnership……..that would never happen, because more money must be pocketed to the previous freedom fighters who are just money launders and thieves now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

clear formSubmit