Positioning of Traffic Officers while trapping motorists.
Questions we as motorists need answered.
1. Where must Traffic Officers stand when monitering speeding motorists with a camara?
2. Are they allowed to trap oncoming motorist on the oppersite side of the road?
3. Are the officers allowed to cross the road to stop speeding motorists,cross a barrior line, endanger his life on a dangerous section of the road?
4. Are the traffic officers allowed to hide their vehicle behind trees?
5. Where can motorists attach pictures to show these areas and sections of the roads?
- Apart from the fact that laser Speed Measuring Equipment must be mounted on a firm and stable surface (a tripod), there is no prescript as to where traffic officers must position themselves.
- There is an additional requirement however that no speed measuring exercise may be mounted within 300m of the commencement of a particular speed limit.
- Yes they are. I am afraid that in terms of the National Road Traffic Act, they are allowed to pretty much what they like.They are not exempt from the Occupational Health and Safety Act however although I have never heard of a complaint being brought against their employers for allowing them to act in a dangerous manner.
- Yes they are. In fact they are allowed to hide pretty much anywhere they like.
- There are several groups on Facebook, etc. where people may vent their anger by posting photographs of what they believe is “illegal speed trapping”. I do however point out that very few of the speed trapping exercises that get posted in these groups are in fact illegal.
I suspect that the reasons that you ask these questions is because you, like a large proportion of the public feel that it is unethical and should therefore be illegal for traffic officers to hide away in bushes to take photographs of motorists who are “speeding”. I share the sentiment but not for the same reasons most people do.
In my view, there is little or no value to mounting speed measuring exercises where people who are allegedly disobeying the speed limit are not stopped immediately at the time. Stopping someone who is disobeying the speed limit achieves a number of things, not least of which is that it actually halts the event of speeding, thereby averting any possible consequences which could arise therefrom. It also gives the traffic officer the opportunity to properly identify the driver of that vehicle and determine whether they are fit to be driving or not, as well as providing them with the opportunity to check the motor vehicle for roadworthiness.
Camera-based speed “trapping” offers none of these opportunities but does offer the traffic authority for whom the traffic officer works, and private companies who supply the speed measuring equipment on a “rental basis” the opportunity to generate limitless fines to post to people. This is the model that has generally been opted for by these traffic authorities and the municipalities under which they operate because traffic law enforcement in South Africa has come to be meaningless in promoting road safety and almost purely driven by revenue generation.
Again, in my view, if camera speed trapping were to be banned in South Africa, one of two things would happen. Either traffic authorities would start doing the job that they are mandated to do, or they would go bankrupt. Unfortunately, while people continue to disobey speed limit en masse, transformation in traffic law enforcement is highly unlikely since deploying speed cameras is a practical guarantee of revenue. If members of the public are truly as disgusted as they say they are about traffic cops hiding in bushes and taking happy snaps of speedsters they would stop feeding the system and start obeying speed limits. It’s not that hard to do and everyone should give it a go.
National Chairman – Justice Project South Africa (NPC)